Thursday, April 20, 2017

Men are seen as livestock:

Among the many men's issues we like to bring up- two stand out as profoundly disgusting, and out do any other men's issue we take issue with. Those are Male Genital Mutilation, and the Mass Genocide of Men. These two issues are given certain names to mask what they really are. They call Male Genital Mutilation 'Circumcision' which sounds less terrible, and they call kidnapping, enslaving, and slaughtering millions of men 'Conscription.'
Both of these practices are demeaning and reduce us to mere livestock- and like livestock, society believes they have the right to brand us and slaughter us for their convenience.

These are the unfortunate facts of the matter- people are disgusted with Female Genital Mutilation- because they see women as human beings to some extent or another- but Male Genital Mutilation, they see as 'a minor surgery.' And even go so far as to say 'the benefits outweigh the risks,' as if it is their decision to cut off parts of our bodies- and they need only be concerned with the survival of the cattle, and no regard will be made for our Natural Rights.

Consider for a moment if in these countries that practiced FGM- they also forced women to sign up for a Colosseum, where they could arbitrarily call them in to be gladiators- to slaughter each other at the expense of the state? Do you know the level of disgust people would have? They'd likely send in troops. Yet the same thing happens to men, and they further demean us by saying 'it's what a man has to do.'

It is time society understand we are not their property-

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

The medical establishment propaganda

Circumcision rates are falling- and recently they have fallen below 50%. {1} The medical establishment knows this- and they know that they make too much money off of sexually mutilating baby boys to let that happen. They know that circumcision destroys sexual pleasure, and that this fact has been among those leading parents to not have their babies undergo MGM.

So they use their propagandic abilities, to tell men that destroying 20,000 of the 24,000 pleasure sensing nerve endings doesn't destroy sexual pleasure. {2} As Brother K said 'I don't need a study to tell me that destroying the external structure of the penis is harmful. Only a fool needs a study to tell them that.' {3}

Of course they are going to say that it doesn't destroy pleasure- if you ask Monsanto if GMO's are harmful, obviously they're going to say no. This is just like the tobacco companies who released bogus studies saying that smoking doesn't put you at risk of cancer. {4} These all changed when a number of 'fringe' studies showed otherwise, and the population changed their mind- only after this did the falsities end.

Many people today forget about how the Medical Establishment used to promote Clitorectomies being done on young girls- and so they do not see history repeating itself. Such inhumane procedures were popular in the 1950's, and reached a peak in the 1970's- but the medical establishment did not admit that it was harmful until public outrage led to its being banned in 1996.

Many people are also not aware that doctors used to bleed out their patients, {5} this used to be considered a medically approved procedure- and yet today, not one doctor would do it. Soon enough circumcision as treatment will be seen as no different than bloodletting- just a harmful, fringe, procedure that primitive idiots who didn't know anything believed wasn't harmful.

The medical establishment, and the circumcision profiteers, will be seen in the same way that the tobacco companies were, and non-therapeutic infant circumcision will be seen as no less than Clitorectomies on young girls, foot binding, and ritual scarring.


Thursday, February 9, 2017

Friday, February 3, 2017

Circumcision is mutilation:

Here in America, circumcision is seen as a minor surgery that really is no big deal: one doctor even said that circumcision should be done routinely like vaccination. {1}

Truthfully,  I'm disgusted. Circumcision is genital mutilation, it isn't even to be compared with vaccination. If a doctor came out and said that every woman should have her clitoris removed routinely at infancy like vaccination he would be hanging from a noose by tomorrow morning.
People are disgusted with FGM, and rightly so, but they don't even think of MGM as MGM: so they have a doctor or Rabbi hack of half their sons penis and destroy 75% of his ability to feel pleasure, {2} for the exact same reasons that Muslims mutilate their daughters genitals: religious, hygiene, or aesthetic reasons.

They don't even think of it as mutilation, they think of it as just like a vaccination or something like that. This is like if it were commonplace to go chopping peoples heads off, and people justified it by likening it to a haircut. It's not a goddamn haircut! Just like circumcision is not a goddam vaccination! It is genital mutilation, and I am disturbed that people even justify it that way.

 Circumcision refers to the removal of normal and healthy male genital tissue which accounts for half of a males erogenous tissue, and which has 20,000 nerve endings. The female equivalent would be to completely remove her clitoris, but to leave the labia intact. Which, by the way, is illegal, and a felony- yet you can have a doctor strap down your newborn baby and, without medical necessity, remove half of his genital organs. There is no f*cking difference between this and Female Genital Mutilation!

If Female Genital Mutilation is defined as:
"All procedures involving partial or total removal of the female external genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons as defined by the World Health Organization." {3}
Then Male Genital Mutilation should be defined as:
"All procedures involving partial or total removal of the male external genitalia or other injury to the male genital organs for non-medical reasons."
And Circumcision fits this definition. 

So why is FGM seen as barbaric (which it is), whereas Circumcision does the same exact thing, and it's seen as nothing more than a vaccine? The answer is very simple, yet terrifying: we live in a world where men have no rights- men are not seen as people but like beasts of labor. This is why it is acceptable to mutilate male genitalia and this is why men ages 18-26 are subject to the draft, and the problem goes so deep, and is so thoroughly embedded in our culture, that most people don't even know it's there.

Despite the fact that circumcision is mutilation, and on the same scale as FGM, most people never even think of it that way, and view it as the equivalent of a vaccine. Some even go so far as to rewrite history and turn this into a man-bashing session:
"Male circ is not a method of controlling males and their sexuality. In nearly every culture that has ever existed (and one might argue that this is even more true of cultures that circumcise), males are dominant." {3}
First of all, circumcision because popular in the U.S. for the purpose of controlling male sexuality, particularly masturbation. Second of all, of course males are dominant in cultures that practice circumcision! This is how it works in cultures that mutilate genitals- just like in Islamic countries it is mostly women who want their daughters genitals mutilated.

Now, a lot of you are going to be like "but there are health benefits to circumcision!" {4} Good God- what the f*ck is wrong with you? The Muslims claim there are benefits to FGM, {5} and these benefits are identical to those of circumcision! We don't cut out our daughters clitoris's because it's easier to clean do we? You people are sickening!

So, I wrote a letter to Donald Trump and am sending it today, here is a copy, {6} if more people send it to him, he is more likely to act.  Label it:
President Donald Trump
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington DC 20500